For academic year 2016-2017, there were 2 student-to-employee sexual misconduct allegations reported. The College investigated and took institutional action on both of them.

For academic year 2017-2018, there was 1 employee-to-employee sexual misconduct allegation reported, and institutional action was taken.

For academic year 2017-2018, there were 18 allegations of student-to-student sexual misconduct reported.  Of those, the College attempted to reach out and investigate all 18. In all instances, resources were provided to the Complainant.

• 7 of the investigations conducted led to some form of institutional action (remedial, educational, referred to student conduct or disciplinary action)
• 7 of the investigations could not be pursued because there was an unknown respondent, the reporting party did not want to participate in the investigation at the time or reported anonymously. 
• 2 of the investigations were determined to be unfounded or not a matter falling under the Sexual Misconduct Policy.
• 2 of the investigations were situations non-Centre related, but survivor support was offered.

For academic year 2017-2018, there were 3 student-to-employee sexual misconduct allegations reported. The College investigated and took institutional action on all of them.

For academic year 2017-2018, there was 1 employee-to-employee sexual misconduct allegation reported, and institutional action was taken.

For academic year 2017-2018, there were 22 allegations of student-to-student sexual misconduct reported.  Of those, the College attempted to reach out and investigate all 22. In all instances, resources were provided to the Complainant. 

• 10 of the investigations conducted led to some form of institutional action (remedial, educational, referred to student conduct or disciplinary action)
• 9 of the investigations could not be pursued because there was an unknown respondent, the reporting party did not want to participate in the investigation at the time or reported anonymously. 
• 1 of the investigations were determined to be unfounded or not a matter falling under the Sexual Misconduct Policy.
• 2 of the investigations were situations non-Centre related, but survivor support was offered.

For academic year 2018-2019, there were 2 student-to-employee sexual misconduct allegations reported. The College investigated and took institutional action on both of them.

For academic year 2018-2019, there were 0 employee-to-employee sexual misconduct allegations reported. 

For academic year 2018-2019, there were 29 allegations of student-to-student sexual misconduct reported.  Of those, the College attempted to reach out and investigate all 29. In all instances, resources were provided to the Complainant.  

• 6 of the investigations conducted led to some form of institutional action (remedial, educational, referred to student conduct or disciplinary action)
• 15 of the investigations could not be pursued because there was an unknown respondent, the reporting party did not want to participate in the investigation at the time or reported anonymously. 
• 2 of the investigations were determined to be unfounded or not a matter falling under the Sexual Misconduct Policy.
• 6 of the investigations were situations non-Centre related, but survivor support was offered.

For academic year 2019-2020, there were 0 student-to-employee sexual misconduct allegations reported. 

For academic year 2019-2020, there were 0 employee-to-employee sexual misconduct allegations reported. 

For academic year 2019-2020, there were 26 allegations of student-to-student sexual misconduct reported.  Of those, the College attempted to reach out and investigate all 26. In all instances, resources were provided to the Complainant.   

• 8 of the investigations conducted led to some form of institutional action (remedial, educational, referred to student conduct or disciplinary action)
• 17 of the investigations could not be pursued because there was an unknown respondent, the reporting party did not want to participate in the investigation at the time or reported anonymously. 
• 0 of the investigations were determined to be unfounded or not a matter falling under the Sexual Misconduct Policy.
• 1 of the investigations were situations non-Centre related, but survivor support was offered.

For academic year 2020-2021, there was 1 student-to-employee sexual misconduct allegations reported.  The College investigated and took institutional action.

For academic year 2020-2021, there were 0 employee-to-employee sexual misconduct allegations reported. 

For academic year 2020-2021, there were 18 allegations of student-to-student sexual misconduct reported.  Of those, the College attempted to reach out and investigate all 18. In all instances, resources were provided to the Complainant.  

• 4 of the investigations conducted led to some form of institutional action (remedial, educational, referred to student conduct or disciplinary action)
• 10 of the investigations could not be pursued because there was an unknown respondent, the reporting party did not want to participate in the investigation at the time or reported anonymously. 
• 4 of the investigations were determined to be unfounded or not a matter falling under the Sexual Misconduct Policy.
• 0 of the investigations were situations non-Centre related, but survivor support was offered.

For academic year 2022-2023, there was 1 student-to-employee sexual misconduct allegations reported.  The College attempted to investigate, but the investigation could not be pursued.

For academic year 2022-2023, there were 0 employee-to-employee sexual misconduct allegations reported. 

For academic year 2022-2023, there were 28 allegations of student-to-student sexual misconduct reported.  Of those, the College attempted to reach out and investigate all 28. In all instances, resources were provided to the Complainant.  

• 5 of the investigations conducted led to some form of institutional action (remedial, educational, referred to student conduct or disciplinary action)
• 20 of the investigations could not be pursued because there was an unknown respondent, the reporting party did not want to participate in the investigation at the time or reported anonymously. 
• 2 of the investigations were determined to be unfounded or not a matter falling under the Sexual Misconduct Policy.
• 2 of the investigations were situations non-Centre related, but survivor support was offered.